Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11352 publications
`It’s still abuse’: Community attitudes and perceptions on AI-generated image-based sexual abuse
Nicola Henry
Gemma Beard
Lisa Given
Information, Communication, & Society (2026)
Preview abstract
There are growing concerns about AI-generated image-based sexual abuse (AI-IBSA), also known as nonconsensual sexualized ′deepfakes.′ Empirical research on AI-IBSA, however, remains very limited. This study surveyed 7231 respondents across Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to investigate community attitudes and perceptions on AI-IBSA. Through a vignette study, we explored the relationship between public familiarity with AI-IBSA, normative concerns about consent, and context-dependent judgments that vary based on the target's identity relational status, and how the content was used. Our findings reveal strong condemnation of AI-IBSA, yet respondents demonstrated low familiarity with the technology and their views varied depending on particular contexts. AI-IBSA targeting intimate partners was viewed as more unacceptable than targeting celebrities, and content created solely for personal use was seen as less unacceptable than content intended for distribution. The study highlights the need for approaches that go beyond technical fixes and punitive measures, advocating for a multifaceted response that integrates ethical data governance, digital sexual literacy, and restorative justice approaches.
View details
MoXaRt: Audio-Visual Object-Guided Sound Interaction for XR
Sieun Kim
Qianhui Zheng
Ruoyu Xu
Ravi Tejasvi
Anuva Kulkarni
Junyi Zhu
2026
Preview abstract
In Extended Reality (XR), complex acoustic environments often overwhelm users, compromising both scene awareness and social engagement due to entangled sound sources. We introduce MoXaRt, a real-time XR system that uses audio-visual cues to separate these sources and enable fine-grained sound interaction. MoXaRt's core is a cascaded architecture that performs coarse, audio-only separation in parallel with visual detection of sources (e.g. faces, instruments). These visual anchors then guide refinement networks to isolate individual sources, separating complex mixes of up to five concurrent sources (e.g. two voices + three instruments) with ca. 2 second processing latency. We validate MoXaRt through a technical evaluation on a new, complex dataset we collected, and a 22-participant user study. Our results demonstrate that MoXaRt significantly improves communication clarity—boosting listening comprehension in noisy conditions by 33.2% (p=0.0058)—and significantly reduces cognitive load (M=7.50 vs. M=3.36, p<0.001), paving the way for more perceptive and socially adept XR experiences.
View details
Preview abstract
Generative AI’s humanlike qualities are driving its rapid adoption in professional domains. However, this anthropomorphic appeal raises concerns from HCI and responsible AI scholars about potential hazards and harms, such as overtrust in system outputs. To investigate how technology workers navigate these humanlike qualities and anticipate emergent harms, we conducted focus groups with 30 professionals across six job functions (ML engineering, product policy, UX research and design, product management, technology writing, and communications). Our findings reveal an unsettled knowledge environment surrounding humanlike generative AI, where workers’ varying perspectives illuminate a range of potential risks for individuals, knowledge work fields, and society. We argue that workers require comprehensive support, including clearer conceptions of “humanlikeness” to effectively mitigate these risks. To aid in mitigation strategies, we provide a conceptual map articulating the identified hazards and their connection to conflated notions of “humanlikeness.”
View details
Preview abstract
High-volume enterprise service organizations face a persistent challenge in transitioning from reactive support models to proactive, preventative ones. This paper introduces the Agentic Trend-to-Knowledge (ATK) methodology, a novel, autonomous framework designed to address this gap. The ATK methodology employs an AI agent that operates in a recurring, closed loop. It first uses a two-stage process for the autonomous thematic analysis of recent support cases to identify the most significant recurring issue. It then leverages Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to source relevant institutional knowledge. A key innovation is the agent's adaptive, bimodal response: if relevant knowledge is found, it drafts a proactive communication for human review; if a knowledge gap is detected, it autonomously creates a content creation task for the appropriate team. This transforms the agent from an automation tool into a proactive process owner that creates a virtuous cycle of continuous improvement for both case deflection and knowledge base quality. By automating the entire workflow from insight to action, the ATK framework provides a concrete methodology for shifting from a "human-in-the-loop" to a more strategic "human-on-the-loop" operational paradigm.
View details
Neural general circulation models for modeling precipitation
Stephan Hoyer
Dmitrii Kochkov
Janni Yuval
Ian Langmore
Science Advances (2026)
Preview abstract
Climate models struggle to accurately simulate precipitation, particularly extremes and the diurnal cycle. While hybrid models combining machine learning and physics have emerged with the premise of improving precipitation simulations, none have proven sufficiently skillful or stable enough to outperform existing models in simulating precipitation.
Here, we present the first hybrid model that is trained directly on precipitation observations. The model runs at 2.8 degrees resolution and is built on the differentiable NeuralGCM framework. This model is stable for decadal simulations and demonstrates significant improvements over existing GCMs, ERA5 reanalysis, and a Global Cloud-Resolving Model in simulating precipitation. Our approach yields reduced biases, a more realistic precipitation distribution, improved representation of extremes, and a more accurate diurnal cycle. Furthermore, it outperforms the ECMWF ensemble for mid-range weather forecasting.
This advance paves the way for more reliable simulations of current climate and for the ability to fully utilize the abundance of existing observations to further improve GCMs.
View details
What’s on My Network? Using Large Language Models to Identify Real-World IoT Devices at Scale
Rameen Mahmood
Danny Yuxing Huang
Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT), Association for Computing Machinery (2026)
Tech Worker Challenges Managing Humanlike GenAI
Eric Corbett
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2026), pp. 1-18
Preview abstract
Organizations are adopting or exploring anthropomorphic genAI — meaning XYZ. Anthropomorphic AI is often held up for its potential to improve the productivity and efficiency of workers and technologies; however, there are not yet accepted industry-wide standards for the responsible development of anthropomorphic technologies. Given their roles as central figures responsible for implementing anthropomorphic genAI into technologies that are served to the broader public, we must understand workers’ reasoning about anthropomorphic genAI to understand its impacts. However, there is a dearth of empirical knowledge about technology workers’ perspectives on anthropomorphic technologies, including their perspectives on potential risks and benefits. To address this gap, we conducted focus groups with 31 technology workers across 6 job roles (UX, software engineers, product managers, designers, marketing, and trust and safety) regarding how they define anthropomorphic genAI, their perceptions of anthropomorphic genAI, and their experiences working with anthropomorphic genAI. We find that workers’ have expansive definitions of what constitutes “humanlike” AI, which at times sit in tension with each other. They draw on their personal and professional standpoints to sensemake about real and possible anthropomorphic genAI hazards to people, knowledge work fields, and society at-large. Importantly, we find that these social hazards map to different facets of anthropomorphic genAI, suggesting that effective mitigation of personal and social risks requires developer attention to specific dimensions of anthropomorphism. We mapped the relationships between dimensions of anthropomorphism and hazards, to support technology workers. We argue that effective mitigation of the risks of anthropomorphism requires attention to the multiple facets of anthropomorphism.
View details
Preview abstract
In some multi-stage software build pipelines, downstream compiler errors may be reported against ephemeral, machine-generated intermediate artifacts rather than original, human-written source code, which can make remediation challenging. A system and method may address this by intercepting a downstream error, mapping its location back to the original source file, and programmatically injecting a dormant suppression tag into the original source code. During a subsequent build, an intermediate transpiler can propagate this tag into a newly generated intermediate artifact. In the intermediate file, the tag may become active and be recognized by the downstream compiler as a directive to suppress the specific error. This approach can facilitate an automated remediation process for certain build failures that avoids direct modification of ephemeral files and uses the original source code as a record for suppression.
View details
VeriGuard: Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Verified Code Generation
Dj Dvijotham
Mirko Montanari
ACL 2026
Preview abstract
Artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving, marked by the emergence of Large Language Model (LLM) agents – systems capable of complex reasoning, planning, and interaction with digital and physical environments. These agents, powered by advancements in LLMs, demonstrate remarkable capabilities across diverse domains, including finance, healthcare, web navigation, software development, and daily task assistance. Unlike traditional AI systems, LLM agents can perceive their surroundings, formulate multi-step plans, utilize external tools and APIs, access memory or knowledge bases, and execute actions to achieve specified goals. This ability to act upon the world, however, introduces significant safety and security challenges.
The safety paradigms developed for traditional LLMs, primarily focused on mitigating harmful textual outputs (e.g., toxicity, bias), are insufficient for safeguarding LLM agents. Agents interacting with dynamic environments and executing actions present a broader attack surface and new categories of risk. These include performing unsafe operations, violating privacy constraints through improper data handling or access control failures, deviating from user objectives (task misalignment), and susceptibility to novel manipulation techniques like indirect prompt injection and memory poisoning. Ensuring the trustworthy operation of these powerful agents is paramount, especially as they are integrated into high-stakes applications. To address this critical challenge, we introduce VeriGuard, a novel framework designed to enhance the safety and reliability of LLM agents by interactively verifying their policies and the actions. VeriGuard integrates a verification module that intercepts code-based actions proposed by the agent. In the first step, VeriGuard will generates and verifies the policies. The policies are rigorously checked against a set of predefined safety and security specifications Then each action will be verified to make sure it will align with the agent specification. This interactive verification loop ensures that the agent's behavior remains within safe operational bounds, effectively preventing the execution of harmful or unintended operations. By verifying each step, VeriGuard provides a robust safeguard, substantially improving the trustworthiness of LLM agents in complex, real-world environments.
View details
Preview abstract
Audio Description ( AD) provides essential access to visual media for blind and low vision ( BLV) audiences. Yet current AD production tools remain largely inaccessible to BLV video creators, who possess valuable expertise but face barriers due to visually- driven interfaces. We present ADCanvas, a multimodal authoring system that supports non- visual control
over audio description ( AD) creation. ADCanvas combines conversational interaction with keyboard- based playback control and a plain- text, screen reader–
accessible editor to support end- to- end AD authoring and visual question answering ( VQA). Combining screen- reader- friendly controls with a multimodal
LLM agent, ADCanvas supports live VQA, script generation, and AD modification. Through a user study with 12 BLV video creators, we find that users adopt
the conversational agent as an informational aide and drafting assistant, while maintaining agency through verification and editing. For example, participants
saw themselves as curators who received information from the model and filtered it down for their audience. Our findings offer design implications for
accessible media tools, including precise editing controls, accessibility support for creative ideation, and configurable rules for human- AI collaboration.
View details
Beyond Vector Similarity: Hierarchical Context-Aware Graph RAG vs Standard RAG in Enterprise Code Migration
Suddhasatwa Bhaumik
Nilesh Jaiswal
Arjit Shukla
Divya Malhotra
Aniket Agrawal
Saurabh Garg
Suchit Puri
Google Cloud India, Google, S. No, AP81, 83, N Main Rd, near Hard Rock Cafe, Koregaon Park Annexe, Mundhwa, Pune, Maharashtra 411036 (2026)
Preview abstract
As enterprises modernize legacy systems (e.g., monolithic Java architectures to Python microservices), Large Language Models (LLMs) have become instrumental in automated code translation.
However, traditional vector-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Standard RAG) struggles
with topological relationships, fetching isolated text chunks that frequently sever inheritance chains and lead to high compilation failure rates.
This paper presents a comparative analysis between Standard RAG and a novel Hierarchical
Context-Resident Graph (HCRG) methodology. Our pipeline utilizes tree-sitter for polyglot
Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) extraction, mapping architectural edges into a Google Cloud Spanner Property Graph, and serializing this structure into a Gemini (on Vertex AI) Context Cache to enable topological, parent-first code translation.
By shifting evaluation from naive text-overlap to a custom 7-metric framework measuring Software Engineering (SE) utility, empirical evaluations on the spring-petclinic-genai repository
demonstrate significant structural improvements. Graph RAG decisively mitigates dependency loss, dropping the API hallucination rate from 56.4% to 16.2%.
Furthermore, it improves Dependency Resolution Quality (DRQ) from 34.8% to
65.9% and enhances Parent-Child Consistency (PCC) from 26.7% to 45.5%. Interestingly, traditional lexical metrics fail to capture this divergence; both methodologies achieved
an identical 91% average CodeBLEU score, effectively masking Standard RAG’s structural
failures behind syntactically plausible but broken code.
However, the results indicate that Graph RAG is not strictly superior across all dimensions. Providing the LLM with dense, global structural context introduces new vulnerabilities: Graph RAG suffers a severe degradation in Cyclomatic Complexity Consistency
(dropping from Standard RAG’s 71.6% to 46.7%) due to defensive over-engineering
by the LLM, alongside a slight drop in Docstring Preservation (67.0% down to 61.0%)
caused by prompt attention dilution.
Ultimately, this research validates that while Graph RAG trades an increase in code complexity
for critical reductions in API hallucinations, it offers a substantially more viable and architecturally sound path for automated enterprise codebase modernisation.
View details
XProf: An Open, Scalable and Extensible Profiling System for the Modern ML Stack
Naveen Kumar
Jose Baiocchi Paredes
Scott Goodson
Kelvin Le
Yin Zhang
Kan Cai
Jiten Thakkar
Sai Ganesh Bandiatmakuri
Yogesh SY
Ani Udipi
Vikas Aggarwal
Ninth Conference on Machine Learning and Systems (2026)
Preview abstract
Optimizing Large Models across thousands of accelerators requires deep system expertise. To address modern machine learning (ML) optimization needs, we present XProf, the ML profiler for the OpenXLA ecosystem. XProf delivers actionable optimization suggestions and in-depth performance analysis, empowering ML researchers and framework users to improve efficiency without specialized systems knowledge. XProf provides a unified, full-stack view of both host (CPU) and device (accelerator - TPUs/GPUs) performance, leveraging tools like the Roofline Model for comprehensive analysis. XProf’s distributed architecture is designed to monitor thousands of chips with minimal workload overhead (<1%). This architecture is made pluggable through the open-source PJRT C API extension, which has facilitated its adoption by third-party accelerator vendors. XProf has been instrumental in achieving significant efficiency gains at Google and winning MLPerf submissions. This paper presents the design and architecture of XProf, showcases its differentiating tools and capabilities, and highlights its impact within Google and across the industry as a state of the art ML profiler. XProf is available as part of the OpenXLA project at https://github.com/openxla/xprof.
View details
Preview abstract
Modern user interfaces are complex composites, with elements originating from various sources, such as the operating system, apps, a web browser, or websites. Many security and privacy models implicitly depend on users correctly identifying an element's source, a concept we term ''surface attribution.'' Through two large-scale vignette-based surveys (N=4,400 and N=3,057), we present the first empirical measurement of this ability.
We find that users struggle, correctly attributing UI source only 55% of the time on desktop and 53% on mobile. Familiarity and strong brand cues significantly improve accuracy, whereas UI positioning, a long-held security design concept especially for browsers, has minimal impact. Furthermore, simply adding a ''Security & Privacy'' brand cue to Android permission prompts failed to improve attribution. These findings demonstrate a fundamental gap in users' mental models, indicating that relying on them to distinguish trusted UI is a fragile security paradigm.
View details
Calibrating Trustworthiness in GenAI
Allison Woodruff
Derrick Feldmann
Colleen Thompson-Kuhn
The Advertising Council Research Institute, The Advertising Council Research Institute (2026)
Preview abstract
Generative or “GenAI”—a type of artificial intelligence that can create new content, including text, images, music, and videos, by learning from existing data—is a constantly changing and improving tool gaining widespread use around the world. According to McKinsey’s 2024 Global Survey on AI adoption, 65% of professionals reported their organizations regularly using GenAI, up from 33% the year prior.
With GenAI no longer a new tool, and one with user adoption continuing to increase year over year, the Ad Council Research Institute (ACRI), in partnership with Google, set out to understand what the American public knows and feels about GenAI in 2025. Who’s familiar with GenAI, and who uses it? How do they feel about its role in work and at home? How much do these users believe in its usefulness and benefits? What messaging (explanations and in-app statements) are most helpful for users?
View details
Understanding U.S. Users' Security and Privacy Transparency Needs for Consumer-Facing Generative AI
Jiaxun Cao
Yu Dong
Chunxi Zhan
Rithvik Neti
Pardis Emami-Naeini
USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) (2026)
Preview abstract
Users increasingly rely on consumer-facing generative AI (GenAI) for tasks ranging from everyday needs to sensitive use cases. Yet, it remains unclear whether and how existing security and privacy (S&P) communications in GenAI tools shape users’ adoption decisions and experiences. Understanding how users seek, interpret, and evaluate S&P information is critical for designing usable transparency that users can trust and act on. We conducted semi-structured interviews and design sessions with 21 U.S. GenAI users. Our findings suggest that available S&P information rarely drove initial adoption in practice, as participants often perceived it as incomplete, ineffective, or not credible. Instead, they relied on rough proxies (e.g., popularity) to infer S&P practices. After adoption, S&P uncertainty constrained participants’ willingness to use GenAI tools, especially for high-stakes purposes, and, in some cases, contributed to discontinued use. Participants therefore called for transparency that supports decisions and actions through trustworthy information (e.g., independent evaluations) and usable interfaces (e.g., on-demand disclosure). We categorize participants’ desired design practices into five dimensions to facilitate systematic future investigation into best practices. We conclude with recommendations for researchers, designers, and policymakers to improve S&P transparency in consumer-facing GenAI.
View details
