Machine Intelligence
Google is at the forefront of innovation in Machine Intelligence, with active research exploring virtually all aspects of machine learning, including deep learning and more classical algorithms. Exploring theory as well as application, much of our work on language, speech, translation, visual processing, ranking and prediction relies on Machine Intelligence. In all of those tasks and many others, we gather large volumes of direct or indirect evidence of relationships of interest, applying learning algorithms to understand and generalize.
Machine Intelligence at Google raises deep scientific and engineering challenges, allowing us to contribute to the broader academic research community through technical talks and publications in major conferences and journals. Contrary to much of current theory and practice, the statistics of the data we observe shifts rapidly, the features of interest change as well, and the volume of data often requires enormous computation capacity. When learning systems are placed at the core of interactive services in a fast changing and sometimes adversarial environment, combinations of techniques including deep learning and statistical models need to be combined with ideas from control and game theory.
Recent Publications
The Ontic-Epistemic Distinction: Implications for General Intelligence
Master's Thesis (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract
The current pursuit of robust machine intelligence is largely predicated on a substrate independent, computational functionalist view of cognition, where sufficiently complex computational processing is expected to eventually yield generalized reasoning. This paper explores the ontological distinctions between these computational frameworks and biological cognition, specifically how these differences impact the capacity for semantic understanding. By analyzing phenomena such as the "reversal curse" where models fail to generalize the symmetry in identity relations (A=B implies B=A), and performance on novel reasoning benchmarks (e.g., ARC-AGI), this paper examines whether current model limitations are transient artifacts of scale or indicative of a distinct architectural category. Integrating Stevan Harnad’s “symbol grounding problem” with Evan Thompson’s biological model of “intrinsic normativity,” I investigate whether robust general intelligence might require sense-making: a process distinct from information processing, whereby an agent’s internal states are causally coupled with its environment via survival or system-wide stakes which grounds symbols in meaning. Current Large Language Models (LLMs) appear to lack this intrinsic normativity, and consequently may operate primarily as epistemic instruments rather than ontic agents. By introducing the concept of “ontic grounding”, this paper presents a potential framework for distinguishing between the simulation of reasoning and true understanding, which could have implications for AI safety and governance.
View details
Preview abstract
Validating conversational artificial intelligence (AI) for regulated medical software applications may present challenges, as static test datasets and manual review may be limited in identifying emergent, conversational anomalies. A multi-agent AI system may be configured in a closed-loop for automated validation. The system can, for example, utilize an end user persona simulator agent to generate prompts for a target model and a domain /regulatory expert adjudicator agent to evaluate the target model’s responses against a configurable rubric. A meta-analysis agent can analyze anomalies to identify underlying vulnerabilities, which may then be used to programmatically synthesize new adversarial personas. This adaptive process can generate evidence to support regulatory compliance and continuous performance monitoring for medical software algorithms systems.
View details
Multi-Agent Design: Optimizing Agents with Better Prompts and Topologies
Han Zhou
Shariq Iqbal
Ivan Vulić
Anna Korhonen
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2026)
Preview abstract
Large language models (LLMs), employed as multiple agents that interact and collaborate with each other, have excelled at solving complex tasks. The agents are programmed with {prompts} that declare their functionality, along with the {workflows} that orchestrate interactions within a structured flow. Designing prompts and workflows for multi-agent systems is inherently complex, especially when addressing a new task. It often demands expert-level knowledge and involves significant trial and error. Gaining a deep understanding of the factors that contribute to effective multi-agent systems is essential for automating the entire process. Motivated by this, we first conduct an in-depth analysis of the design spaces for multi-agent systems, focusing on the impact of prompts, scaling the number of agents, and common types of agentic modules. Our findings reveal that top-performing systems often emerge from simpler design spaces, where prompts play a critical role in enhancing agent functionality and enabling more effective scaling. Based on the insights, we propose Multi-Agent System Search (MASS), a multi-stage optimization framework that performs the optimization in a pruned design space, with prompts and an influential subset of modules. We show that MASS-optimized multi-agent systems outperform existing alterntives by a substantial margin. Based on the MASS-found systems, we finally propose design principles behind building effective multi-agent systems.
View details
A Framework for Interactive Machine Learning and Enhanced Conversational Systems
Jerry Young
Richard Abisla
Sanjay Batra
Mikki Phan
Nature, Springer-Verlag (2026)
Preview abstract
Conversational systems are increasingly prevalent, yet current versions often fail to support the full range of human speech, including variations in speed, rhythm, syntax, grammar, articulation, and resonance. This reduces their utility for individuals with dysarthria, apraxia, dysphonia, and other language and speech-related disabilities. Building on research that emphasizes the need for specialized datasets and model training tools, our study uses a scaffolded approach to understand the ideal model training and voice recording process. Our findings highlight two distinct user flows for improving model training and provide six guidelines for future conversational system-related co-design frameworks. This study offers important insights on creating more effective conversational systems by emphasizing the need to integrate interactive machine learning into training strategies.
View details
Expert evaluation of LLM world models: A high-Tc superconductivity case study
Haoyu Guo
Maria Tikhanovskaya
Paul Raccuglia
Alexey Vlaskin
Chris Co
Scott Ellsworth
Matthew Abraham
Lizzie Dorfman
Peter Armitage
Chunhan Feng
Antoine Georges
Olivier Gingras
Dominik Kiese
Steve Kivelson
Vadim Oganesyan
Brad Ramshaw
Subir Sachdev
Senthil Todadri
John Tranquada
Eun-Ah Kim
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2026)
Preview abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) show great promise as a powerful tool for scientific literature exploration. However, their effectiveness in providing scientifically accurate and comprehensive answers to complex questions within specialized domains remains an active area of research. This work evaluates the performance of six different LLM-based systems for answering scientific literature questions, including commercially available closed models and a custom retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system capable of retrieving images alongside text. We conduct a rigorous expert evaluation of the systems in the domain of high-temperature cuprate superconductors, a research area that involves material science, experimental physics, computation, and theoretical physics. We use an expert-curated database of 1726 scientific papers and a set of 67 expert-formulated questions. The evaluation employs a multi-faceted rubric assessing balanced perspectives, factual comprehensiveness, succinctness, evidentiary support, and image relevance. Our results demonstrate that RAG-based systems, powered by curated data and multimodal retrieval, outperform existing closed models across key metrics, particularly in providing comprehensive and well-supported answers, and in retrieving relevant visual information. This study provides valuable insights into designing and evaluating specialized scientific literature understanding systems, particularly with expert involvement, while also highlighting the importance of rich, domain-specific data in such systems.
View details
Preview abstract
Automating AI research differs from general software engineering due to computationally expensive evaluation (e.g., model training) and opaque performance attribution. Current LLM-based agents struggle here, often generating monolithic scripts that ignore execution costs and causal factors. We introduce MARS (Modular Agent with Reflective Search), a framework optimized for autonomous AI research. MARS relies on three pillars: (1) Budget-Aware Planning via cost-constrained Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explicitly balance performance with execution expense; (2) Modular Construction, employing a "Design-Decompose-Implement" pipeline to manage complex research repositories; and (3) Comparative Reflective Memory, which addresses credit assignment by analyzing solution differences to distill high-signal insights. MARS achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source frameworks on MLE-Bench under comparable settings, maintaining competitiveness with the global leaderboard's top methods. Furthermore, the system exhibits qualitative "Aha!" moments, where 63% of all utilized lessons originate from cross-branch transfer, demonstrating that the agent effectively generalizes insights across search paths.
View details
×
![]()