Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 558 publications
Preview abstract
Modern user interfaces are complex composites, with elements originating from various sources, such as the operating system, apps, a web browser, or websites. Many security and privacy models implicitly depend on users correctly identifying an element's source, a concept we term ''surface attribution.'' Through two large-scale vignette-based surveys (N=4,400 and N=3,057), we present the first empirical measurement of this ability.
We find that users struggle, correctly attributing UI source only 55% of the time on desktop and 53% on mobile. Familiarity and strong brand cues significantly improve accuracy, whereas UI positioning, a long-held security design concept especially for browsers, has minimal impact. Furthermore, simply adding a ''Security & Privacy'' brand cue to Android permission prompts failed to improve attribution. These findings demonstrate a fundamental gap in users' mental models, indicating that relying on them to distinguish trusted UI is a fragile security paradigm.
View details
Approximate vs Precise: An experiment in what impacts user choice when apps request location access
Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’26), April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain (2026)
Preview abstract
User location data is highly sensitive, yet commonly requested by mobile apps for both core functionality and monetization. To improve user privacy, the major mobile platforms, Android and iOS, made changes so that when apps request precise location access, users can choose to share only their approximate location. However, the platforms have diverging interfaces: Android offers a side-by-side choice and iOS offers a corner toggle. This study evaluates which factors impact users’ choices when apps request location access via a randomized controlled experiment with 2579 US Android users. We tested the impact of app type, whether a reason for the request was provided, and the quality and content of the reason, including monetization. We do not find the reasons have an effect. Instead, we find users’ choices are impacted by app type and user demographics. We find that when users are given a side-by-side choice to allow approximate versus precise location access, they make reasonable choices. Of users who allowed access, the vast majority (90.7%) chose precise for a rideshare app versus the majority (71.3%) chose approximate for a local news app. Concerningly, the majority also allowed location access to a wallpaper app, and older users were significantly more likely to allow apps precise location access. We conclude by discussing implications for app platforms and future work.
View details
Uncovering Relationships between Android Developers, User Privacy, and Developer Willingness to Reduce Fingerprinting Risks
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’26) (2026)
Preview abstract
The major mobile platforms, Android and iOS, have introduced changes that restrict user tracking to improve user privacy, yet apps continue to covertly track users via device fingerprinting. We study the opportunity to improve this dynamic with a case study on mobile fingerprinting that evaluates developers’ perceptions of how well platforms protect user privacy and how developers perceive platform privacy interventions. Specifically, we study developers’ willingness to make changes to protect users from fingerprinting and how developers consider trade-offs between user privacy and developer effort. We do this via a survey of 246 Android developers, presented with a hypothetical Android change that protects users from fingerprinting at the cost of additional developer effort.
We find developers overwhelmingly (89%) support this change, even when they anticipate significant effort, yet prefer the change be optional versus required. Surprisingly, developers who use fingerprinting are six times more likely to support the change, despite being most impacted by it. We also find developers are most concerned about compliance and enforcement. In addition, our results show that while most rank iOS above Android for protecting user privacy, this distinction significantly reduces among developers very familiar with fingerprinting. Thus there is an important opportunity for platforms and developers to collaboratively build privacy protections, and we present actionable ways platforms can facilitate this.
View details
"It didn’t feel right but I needed a job so desperately": Understanding People's Emotions & Help Needs During Financial Scams
G. Jake Chanenson
Tara Matthews
Jessica McClearn
Sarah Meiklejohn
Mia Hassoun
2026
Preview abstract
Online financial scams represent a long-standing and serious threat for which people seek help. We present a study to understand people’s in situ motivations for engaging with scams and the help needs they express before, during, and after encountering a scam. We identify the main emotions scammers exploited (e.g., fear, hope) and characterize how they did so. We examine factors—such as financial insecurity and legal precarity—which elevate people’s risk of engaging with specific scams and experiencing harm. We indicate when people sought help and describe their help-seeking needs and emotions at different stages of the scam. We discuss how these needs could be met through the design of contextually-specific prevention, diagnostic, mitigation, and recovery interventions.
View details
Who is At-Risk? Surveying the Prevalence of Risk Factors and Tech-Facilitated Attacks in the United States
Sharon Heung
Claire Weizenegger
Mo Houtti
Tara Matthews
Ashley Walker
2026
Preview abstract
A growing body of qualitative research has identified contextual risk factors that elevate people’s chances of experiencing digital-safety attacks. However, the lack of quantitative data on the population level distribution of these risk factors prevents policymakers and tech companies from developing targeted, evidence-based interventions to improve digital safety. To address this gap, we surveyed 5,001 adults in the United States to analyze: (1) the frequency of and relationship between digital-safety attacks (e.g., scams, harassment, account hacking), and (2) how these attacks align with 10 contextual risk factors. Nearly half of our respondents identify as resource constrained, which significantly correlates with higher likelihood of experiencing four common attacks. We also present qualitative insights to expand our understanding of the factors beyond the existing literature (e.g., “prominence” included high-visibility roles in local communities). This study provides the first large-scale quantitative analysis correlating digital-safety attacks with contextual risk factors and demographics.
View details
Preview abstract
Generative AI (GenAI) is evolving from standalone tools to interconnected ecosystems that integrate chatbots, cloud platforms, and third-party services. While this ecosystem model enables personalization and extended services, it also introduces complex information flows and amplifies privacy risks. Existing solutions focus on system-level protections, offering little support for users to make meaningful privacy choices. To address this gap, we conducted two vignette-based survey studies with 486 participants and a followup interview study with 16 participants. We also explored users’ needs and preferences for privacy choice design across both GenAI personalization and data-sharing. Our results reveal paradoxical patterns: participants sometimes trusted third-party ecosystems more for personalization but perceived greater control in first-party ecosystems when data was shared externally. We discuss design implications for privacy choice interfaces that enhance transparency, control, and trust in GenAI ecosystems.
View details
Preview abstract
We introduce AMS (Activation-based Model Scanner), a tool that detects modifications to safety training in language models by measuring the geometric structure of safety-relevant concepts in activation space. Safety training creates measurable separation between harmful and benign content classes; certain safety modifications collapse or rotate this structure, while others leave it intact. We validate AMS across 14 model configurations spanning 4 architecture families (Llama, Gemma, Qwen, Mistral) and four safety-modification categories (instruction-tuned, base, abliterated, uncensored fine-tunes). Leave-one-out cross-validation of thresholds achieves 71% accuracy (10/14); bootstrap 95% confidence intervals on σ point estimates have median width 3.4σ and a substantial fraction of cells cross the PASS threshold under resampling. We further measure behavioral compliance on 20 stratified JailbreakBench prompts per model and find that σ on the harmful-content concept predicts compliance with Pearson r=−0.546 ( p=0.043 ); the rank-order Spearman correlation is weaker ( ρ=−0.423 , p=0.13 ). The structural signal predicts behavior directionally but with meaningful noise. Mechanistic analysis identifies a four-class taxonomy of safety-training modifications distinguished by activation-space signature: 1) training removal collapses cluster separation (e.g., base models, Dolphin variants: 0.5– 1.4σ ); 2) weight-orthogonalization-style abliteration both collapses separation and rotates the refusal direction (Llama-3.1-abliterated: σ=3.33 , direction cos sim 0.30); 3) rotation-without-collapse abliteration preserves cluster separation while rotating the refusal direction (Gemma-2-9b-abliterated: σ=4.54 , direction cos sim 0.84); and 4) behavioral fine-tuning that preserves both magnitude and direction (DarkIdol-1.2-Uncensored: σ=5.45 , direction preserved, 97% behavioral compliance). 1) and 2) AMS’s Tier 1 σ -threshold detects classes; 3) Tier 2 direction-similarity verification detects class; and 4) Class is undetectable by activation-only probing and represents a documented failure mode of the approach. We discuss threshold calibration, limitations of single-run measurement, and the open problem of detecting behavioral-only safety modifications.
View details
Preview abstract
The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) and smart home ecosystems has led to a fragmented landscape of user data management across consumer electronics (CE) such as Smart TVs, gaming consoles, and set-top boxes. Current onboarding processes on these devices are characterized by high friction due to manual data entry and opaque data-sharing practices. This paper introduces the User Data Sharing System (UDSS), a platform-agnostic framework designed to facilitate secure, privacy-first PII (Personally Identifiable Information) exchange between device platforms and third-party applications. Our system implements a Contextual Scope Enforcement (CSE) mechanism that programmatically restricts data exposure based on user intent—specifically distinguishing between Sign-In and Sign-Up workflows. Unlike cloud-anchored identity standards such as FIDO2/WebAuthn, UDSS is designed for shared, device-centric CE environments where persistent user-to-device bind-ing cannot be assumed. We further propose a tiered access model that balances developer needs with regulatory compliance (GDPR/CCPA). A proof-of-concept implementation on a reference ARMv8 Linux-based middleware demonstrates that UDSS reduces user onboarding latency by 65% and measurably reduces PII over-exposure risk through protocol-enforced data minimization. This framework provides a standardized approach to identity management in the heterogeneous CE market.
View details
SAC133 - SSAC Comments on Proposed Root KSK Algorithm Rollover
Wes Hardaker
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Reports and Advisories (2026), pp. 9
Preview abstract
The SSAC supports the transition from RSA with SHA-256 (Algorithm 8) to ECDSA P-256
with SHA-256 (Algorithm 13) as the cryptographic algorithm for the RootKSK. The root zone
has relied on RSA-based algorithms since DNSSEC signing began in 2010. The algorithm did
not change during the first KSK rollover in 2018 or during the second rollover currently
underway and scheduled to complete in October 2026. Establishing a clear and predictable
process for algorithm transitions is essential to the long-term security of the root zone, and the
SSAC observes that the proposal addresses the Recommendation 23 of the SSR2 Review
accordingly.
The SSAC notes that the proposal builds upon the Root Zone DNSSEC Algorithm Rollover
Study published by ICANN in May 2024, which assessed resolver and authoritative server
support for alternative algorithms, analyzed rollover methodologies, and evaluated operational
risks. The SSAC finds that the proposal implements the study’s recommendations. The SSAC also notes that this proposal is consistent with the SSAC’s prior work on DNSSEC key rollover,
including SAC063, SAC073, SAC102, and SAC108.
The SSAC encourages ICANN to proceed with this rollover. Specific comments on the
proposal’s methodology, timeline, and operational readiness follow
View details
The Synthetic Gap: Automating Forensic Investigation of "AI Slop" with the Scaled Abuse Forensics Examiner (SAFE)
Vahid Jalali
Longling Wang
Geethik Narayana Kamineni
Utkarsh Chaudhary
Crystal Zhao
Lucas Liu
2026
Preview abstract
Generative AI capabilities have enabled malicious actors to flood online platforms with "AI slop"—mass-produced, low-quality synthetic media designed to overwhelm traditional integrity systems. These adversarial campaigns often utilize coordinated networks to distribute unique, localized variations of synthetic content, rendering static detection methods ineffective. The signals to detect coordination often have recall gaps. The content is not exactly duplicative to be in the same repetitive video cluster. The abusers however show similar patterns of behavior which need forensics. Manual forensic investigations cannot scale to match the velocity of these generative attacks.
To address this, we present SAFE (Scaled Abuse Forensics Examiner), an automated multi-agent architecture designed for the scalable forensics of adversarial synthetic media. The system decomposes the investigation process into specialized agents: a Cluster Understanding Agent specialized in analyzing the relations between channels in a cluster, a Behavior Understanding Agent that identifies inorganic spatiotemporal patterns, and a Content Understanding Agent that utilizes LoRA-adapted Large Language Models (LLMs) and few-shot learning to detect existing policy violations and spirit of the policy violations respectively . A Root Agent synthesizes these multimodal signals to render a final verdict. Early deployment results indicate that SAFE significantly accelerates the identification of novel synthetic threats, reducing forensic investigation time compared to human-in-the-loop workflows.
View details
Preview abstract
Online video platforms face an exponential challenge in detecting and mitigating the flood of AI-generated "slop" and synthetic spam perpetuated by coordinated malicious actors. This content is increasingly designed to exploit the limitations of traditional media forensics, often utilizing generative AI to produce unique, localized variations of harmful or low-quality material at scale. Traditional content-centric moderation fails against this coordinated, adversarial generation strategy.
This paper presents a novel, scalable defense system deployed at a major Online Video Platform (OVP) to identify and terminate clusters of coordinated accounts exhibiting a prevalence of adversarial synthetic content. The approach leverages a multi-faceted architecture incorporating two core machine learning components: a robust Coordinated Bot-Net Detector (via Account Relatedness) and a Synthetic Pattern Classifier (formerly BT Classifier). Crucially, we introduce an advanced AI enhancement layer utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs), specialized via Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and Automatic Prompt Optimization (APO), to achieve rapid, high-precision semantic understanding of emerging synthetic spam trends.
Operational data spanning a six-month period demonstrates the system's significant impact, resulting in the successful termination of 50K clusters comprising 130K channels of synthetic spam generators. Furthermore, the LLM-driven automation significantly improves operational efficiency, saving approximately 83 human review hours to cut down human reviews by 50%. This work details a critical, deployed solution that provides essential scalability and adversarial resilience against sophisticated generative attacks.
View details
Beyond PII: How Users Perceive and Attempt to Mitigate Implicit LLM Inference
Synthia Wang
Nick Feamster
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Association for Computing Machinery
Preview abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT can infer personal attributes from seemingly innocuous text, raising privacy risks beyond memorized data leakage. While prior work has demonstrated these risks, little is known about how users estimate and respond. We conducted a survey with 240 U.S. participants who judged text snippets for inference risks, reported concern levels, and attempted rewrites to block inference. We compared their rewrites with those generated by ChatGPT and Rescriber, a state-of-the-art sanitization tool. Results show that participants struggled to anticipate inference, performing a little better than chance. User rewrites were effective in just 28% of cases - better than Rescriber but worse than ChatGPT. We examined our participants’ rewriting strategies, and observed that while paraphrasing was the most common strategy it is also the least effective; instead abstraction and adding ambiguity were more successful. Our work highlights the importance of inference-aware design in LLM interactions.
View details
LLM-Powered Analysis of IoT User Reviews: Tracking and Ranking Security and Privacy Concerns
Taufiq Islam Protick
Anupam Das
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) (2026)
Preview abstract
Being able to understand the security and privacy (S&P) concerns of IoT users brings benefits to both developers and users. To learn about users' views, we examine Amazon IoT reviews - one of the biggest IoT markets. This work presents a state-of-the-art methodology to identify and categorize reviews in which users express S&P concerns. We developed an automated pipeline by fine-tuning GPT-3.5-Turbo to build two models: the Classifier-Rationalizer-Categorizer and the Thematic Mapper. By leveraging dynamic few-shot prompting and the model's large context size, our pipeline achieved over 97% precision and recall, significantly outperforming keyword-based and classical ML methods. We applied our pipeline to 91K Amazon reviews about fitness trackers, smart speakers and cameras, over multiple years. We found that on average 5% contained S&P concerns, while security camera exhibited the highest prevalence at 10%. Our method detected significantly more S&P-relevant reviews than prior works: 15x more for fitness trackers, 29% more for smart speakers, and 70% more for cameras. Our longitudinal analysis reveals that concerns like surveillance and data control have persisted for years, suggesting limited industry progress. We demonstrate that across all device types, users consistently demand more precise control over what data is collected and shared. We uncover challenges in multi-user and multi-device interactions, identifying two previously unreported themes concerning inadequate controls for account separation and data access. These findings, ranging from broad persistent trends to specific instances of customer loss, offer actionable insights for developers to improve user satisfaction and trust.
View details
Preview abstract
This paper introduces Operationalized Temporal Entity Resolution, a distributed system architecture designed to resolve data consistency challenges in modern Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) environments. processing petabytes of high-velocity telemetry. We address the critical failure mode of ”State Smearing”—a temporal discrepancy between an entity’s state at event time versus analysis time—which frequently corrupts forensic timelines, particularly regarding ephemeral assets like containers and DHCP leases. Our approach coalesces heterogeneous data from diverse log sources into a single, canonical representation, processing over 2 billion entity fragments daily. By leveraging a deterministic Dynamic Graph Resolution via modified distributed connected components and a novel Density-Aware Temporal Checkpointing algorithm, we generate precise validity intervals. This method embeds temporal state directly into the resolution graph, eliminating the need for computationally expensive query-time joins. Ultimately, this architecture enables security analysts to perform ”time-travel” queries to reconstruct historical states accurately. Analysis of a production environment demonstrates that 8–16% of threat detection rules critically depend on this enriched temporal merging.
View details
Security Signals: Making Web Security Posture Measurable At Scale
Michele Spagnuolo
David Dworken
Artur Janc
Santiago (Sal) Díaz
Workshop on Measurements, Attacks, and Defenses for the Web (MADWeb)
Preview abstract
The area of security measurability is gaining increased attention, with a wide range of organizations calling for the development of scalable approaches for assessing the security of software systems and infrastructure. In this paper, we present our experience developing Security Signals, a comprehensive system providing security measurability for web services, deployed in a complex application ecosystem of thousands of web services handling traffic from billions of users. The system collects security-relevant information from production HTTP traffic at the reverse proxy layer, utilizing novel concepts such as synthetic signals augmented with additional risk information to provide a holistic view of the security posture of individual services and the broader application ecosystem. This approach to measurability has enabled large-scale security improvements to our services, including prioritized rollouts of security enhancements and the implementation of automated regression monitoring. Furthermore, it has proven valuable for security research and prioritization of defensive work. Security Signals addresses shortcomings of prior web measurability proposals by tracking a comprehensive set of security properties relevant to web applications, and by extracting insights from collected data for use by both security experts and non-experts. We believe the lessons learned from the implementation and use of Security Signals offer valuable insights for practitioners responsible for web service security, potentially inspiring new approaches to web security measurability.
View details
