Health & Bioscience
Research in health and biomedical sciences has a unique potential to improve peoples’ lives, and includes work ranging from basic science that aims to understand biology, to diagnosing individuals’ diseases, to epidemiological studies of whole populations. We recognize that our strengths in machine learning, large-scale computing, and human-computer interaction can help accelerate the progress of research in this space. By collaborating with world-class institutions and researchers and engaging in both early-stage research and late-stage work, we hope to help people live healthier, longer, and more productive lives.
Recent Publications
Preview abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly integrated into healthcare, ensuring that this innovation helps to combat health inequities requires engaging marginalized communities in health AI futuring. However, little research has examined Black populations’ perspectives on the use of AI in health contexts, despite the widespread health inequities they experience–inequities that are already perpetuated by AI. Addressing this research gap, through qualitative workshops with 18 Black adults, we characterize participants’ cautious optimism for health AI addressing structural well-being barriers (e.g., by providing second opinions that introduce fairness into an unjust healthcare system), and their concerns that AI will worsen health inequities (e.g., through health AI biases they deemed inevitable and the problematic reality of having to trust healthcare providers to use AI equitably). We advance health AI research by articulating previously-unreported health AI perspectives from a population experiencing significant health inequities, and presenting key considerations for future work.
View details
Performance analysis of updated Sleep Tracking algorithms across Google and Fitbit wearable devices
Arno Charton
Linda Lei
Siddhant Swaroop
Marius Guerard
Michael Dixon
Logan Niehaus
Shao-Po Ma
Logan Schneider
Ross Wilkinson
Ryan Gillard
Conor Heneghan
Pramod Rudrapatna
Mark Malhotra
Shwetak Patel
Google, Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043 (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract
Background: The general public has increasingly adopted consumer wearables for sleep tracking over the past 15 years, but reports on performance versus gold standards such as polysomnogram (PSG), high quality sleep diaries and at-home portable EEG systems still show potential for improved performance. Two aspects in particular are worthy of consideration: (a) improved recognition of sleep sessions (times when a person is in bed and has attempted to sleep), and (b) improved accuracy on recognizing sleep stages relative to an accepted standard such as PSG.
Aims: This study aimed to: 1) provide an update on the methodology and performance of a system for correctly recognizing valid sleep sessions, and 2) detail an updated description of how sleep stages are calculated using accelerometer and inter-beat intervals
Methods: Novel machine learning algorithms were developed to recognize sleep sessions and sleep stages using accelerometer sensors and inter-beat intervals derived from the watch or tracker photoplethysmogram. Algorithms were developed on over 3000 nights of human-scored free-living sleep sessions from a representative population of 122 subjects, and then tested on an independent validation set of 47 users. Within sleep sessions, an algorithm was developed to recognize periods when the user was attempting to sleep (Time-Attempting-To-Sleep = TATS). For sleep stage estimation, an algorithm was trained on human expert-scored polysomnograms, and then tested on 50 withheld subject nights for its ability to recognize Wake, Light (N1/N2), Deep (N3) and REM sleep relative to expert scored labels.
Results: For sleep session estimation, the algorithm had at least 95% overlap on TATS with human consensus scoring for 94% of nights from healthy sleepers. For sleep stage estimation, comparing with the current Fitbit algorithm, Cohen’s kappa for four-class determination of sleep stage increased from an average of 0.56 (std 0.13) to 0.63 (std 0.12), and average accuracy increased from 71% (std 0.10) to 77% (std 0.078)
Conclusion: A set of new algorithms has been developed and tested on Fitbit and Pixel Watches and is capable of providing robust and accurate measurement of sleep in free-living environments.
View details
A Scalable Framework for Evaluating Health Language Models
Neil Mallinar
Tony Faranesh
Brent Winslow
Nova Hammerquist
Ben Graef
Cathy Speed
Mark Malhotra
Shwetak Patel
Xavi Prieto
Daniel McDuff
Ahmed Metwally
(2025)
Preview abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for analyzing complex datasets. Recent studies demonstrate their potential to generate useful, personalized responses when provided with patient-specific health information that encompasses lifestyle, biomarkers, and context. As LLM-driven health applications are increasingly adopted, rigorous and efficient one-sided evaluation methodologies are crucial to ensure response quality across multiple dimensions, including accuracy, personalization and safety. Current evaluation practices for open-ended text responses heavily rely on human experts. This approach introduces human factors and is often cost-prohibitive, labor-intensive, and hinders scalability, especially in complex domains like healthcare where response assessment necessitates domain expertise and considers multifaceted patient data. In this work, we introduce Adaptive Precise Boolean rubrics: an evaluation framework that streamlines human and automated evaluation of open-ended questions by identifying gaps in model responses using a minimal set of targeted rubrics questions. Our approach is based on recent work in more general evaluation settings that contrasts a smaller set of complex evaluation targets with a larger set of more precise, granular targets answerable with simple boolean responses. We validate this approach in metabolic health, a domain encompassing diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and obesity. Our results demonstrate that Adaptive Precise Boolean rubrics yield higher inter-rater agreement among expert and non-expert human evaluators, and in automated assessments, compared to traditional Likert scales, while requiring approximately half the evaluation time of Likert-based methods. This enhanced efficiency, particularly in automated evaluation and non-expert contributions, paves the way for more extensive and cost-effective evaluation of LLMs in health.
View details
Light-microscopy-based dense connectomic reconstruction of mammalian brain tissue
Mojtaba R. Tavakoli
Julia Lyudchik
Vitali Vistunou
Nathalie Agudelo Duenas
Jakob Vorlaufer
Christoph Sommer
Caroline Kreuzinger
Barbara de Souza Oliveira
Alban Cenameri
Gaia Novarino
Johann Danzl
Nature (2025)
Preview abstract
The information-processing capability of the brain’s cellular network depends on the physical wiring pattern between neurons and their molecular and functional characteristics. Charting neurons and resolving the individual synaptic connections requires volumetric imaging at nanoscale resolution and comprehensive cellular contrast. Light microscopy is uniquely positioned to visualize specific molecules but dense, synapse-level circuit reconstruction by light microscopy has been out of reach due to limitations in resolution, contrast, and volumetric imaging capability. Here we developed light-microscopy based connectomics (LICONN). We integrated hydrogel embedding and expansion with comprehensive deep-learning based segmentation and analysis of connectivity, thus directly incorporating molecular information in synapse-level brain tissue reconstructions. LICONN will allow synapse-level brain tissue phenotyping in biological experiments in a readily adoptable manner.
View details
Participatory AI Considerations for Advancing Racial Health Equity
Jatin Alla
Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (2025)
Accurate human genome analysis with Element Avidity sequencing
Andrew Carroll
Daniel Cook
Lucas Brambrink
Bryan Lajoie
Kelly N. Wiseman
Sophie Billings
Semyon Kruglyak
Bryan R. Lajoie
Junhua Zhao
Shawn E. Levy
Kishwar Shafin
Maria Nattestad
BMC Bioinformatics (2025)
Preview abstract
We investigate the new sequencing technology Avidity from Element Biosciences. We show that Avidity whole genome sequencing matches mapping and variant calling accuracy with Illumina at high coverages (30x-50x) and is noticeably more accurate at lower coverages (20x-30x). We quantify base error rates of Element reads, finding lower error rates, especially in homopolymer and tandem repeat regions. We use Element’s ability to generate paired end sequencing with longer insert sizes than typical short–read sequencing. We show that longer insert sizes result in even higher accuracy, with long insert Element sequencing giving noticeably more accurate genome analyses at all coverages.
View details
Some of our teams
×
![]()