The Case for Leveraging Transport Signals to Improve Internet Speed Test Efficiency
Abstract
Internet speed tests are an important tool to enable consumers and regulators to monitor the quality of Internet access. However, increased Internet speeds to the home and an increased demand for speed testing pose scaling challenges to providers of speed tests, who must maintain costly infrastructure to keep up with this demand. In recent years, this has led the popular NDT speed test to limit data transfer to a total of 250MB, which comes at the cost of accuracy for high bandwidth speed test clients.
In this paper, we observe that the NDT speed test server’s congestion control algorithm (BBRv1) is also trying to estimate the capacity of the connection. We leverage this observation and signals from BBR to improve the accuracy and efficiency of speed tests. We first show how leveraging signals from BBR can more than double the accuracy of a 10MB test–from 17% to 43%–for clients with speeds over 400Mbps.
We then show how using BBR signals to adaptively end the speed test reduces data transfer by 36% and increased accuracy by 13% for high bandwidth clients, relative to a 100MB fixed length test. Even accounting for clients that never observe enough samples to utilize the BBR signal, this adaptive approach still uses 25% less data than a fixed 100MB test with 37-44% higher accuracy.
In this paper, we observe that the NDT speed test server’s congestion control algorithm (BBRv1) is also trying to estimate the capacity of the connection. We leverage this observation and signals from BBR to improve the accuracy and efficiency of speed tests. We first show how leveraging signals from BBR can more than double the accuracy of a 10MB test–from 17% to 43%–for clients with speeds over 400Mbps.
We then show how using BBR signals to adaptively end the speed test reduces data transfer by 36% and increased accuracy by 13% for high bandwidth clients, relative to a 100MB fixed length test. Even accounting for clients that never observe enough samples to utilize the BBR signal, this adaptive approach still uses 25% less data than a fixed 100MB test with 37-44% higher accuracy.
