Alan Karthikesalingam

Alan Karthikesalingam

Alan is a Principal Scientist and Director at Google DeepMind working on biomedical AI. He cofounded and leads AI co-clinician and AI co-scientist; and previously founded and led precursors in AMIE, Med-PaLM, Med-PaLM-2 and Med-PaLM-Multimodal. His research in over 10 full Nature/Nature-Medicine publication spans breakthroughs for conversational and diagnostic AI systems in multiple domains. These include the first example of an AI system passing medical license-style examinations, competently undertaking medical consultations, and solving multimodal diagnostic challenges spanning cardiology, radiology, oncology, ophthalmology, dermatology and electronic health records. He is an honorary Lecturer in Vascular Surgery at Imperial College in London. He completed his MA in Neuroscience and Medical Degree (MBBChir) at the University of Cambridge before specialist training in surgery in the London Deanery, where he completed his Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS), PhD in Vascular Surgery and appointment as NIHR Clinical Lecturer. Prior to joining Google DeepMind Alan had published over 150 peer-reviewed articles including first-author studies in the New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet.
Authored Publications
Sort By
  • Title
  • Title, descending
  • Year
  • Year, descending
A prospective clinical feasibility study of a conversational diagnostic AI in an ambulatory primary care clinic
Peter Brodeur
Jacob M. Koshy
Khaled Saab
Ava Homiar
Roma Ruparel
Charles Wu
Ryutaro Tanno
Joseph Xu
Amy Wang
David Stutz
Hannah M. Ferrera
David Barrett
Lindsey Crowley
Jihyeon Lee
Spencer E. Rittner
Selena K. Zhang
Elahe Vedadi
Christine G. Kohn
Kavita Kulkarni
Vinay Kadiyala
Sara Mahdavi
Wendy Du
David Feinbloom
Renee Wong
Petar Sirkovic
Alessio Orlandi
Juro Gottweis
Joelle Barral
Kat Chou
James Manyika
Rob Fields
Jonathan X. Li
Marc L. Cohen
Adam Rodman
arXiv (2026)
Preview abstract Large language model (LLM)-based AI systems have shown promise for patient-facing diagnostic and management conversations in simulated settings. Translating these systems into clinical practice requires assessment in real-world workflows with rigorous safety oversight. We report a prospective, single-arm feasibility study of an LLM-based conversational AI, the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE), conducting clinical history taking and presentation of potential diagnoses for patients to discuss with their provider at urgent care appointments at a leading academic medical center. 100 adult patients completed an AMIE text-chat interaction up to 5 days before their appointment. We sought to assess the conversational safety and quality, patient and clinician experience, and clinical reasoning capabilities compared to primary care providers (PCPs). Human safety supervisors monitored all patient-AMIE interactions in real time and did not need to intervene to stop any consultations based on pre-defined criteria. Patients reported high satisfaction and their attitudes towards AI improved after interacting with AMIE (p < 0.001). PCPs found AMIE's output useful with a positive impact on preparedness. AMIE's differential diagnosis (DDx) included the final diagnosis, per chart review 8 weeks post-encounter, in 90% of cases, with 75% top-3 accuracy. Blinded assessment of AMIE and PCP DDx and management (Mx) plans suggested similar overall DDx and Mx plan quality, without significant differences for DDx (p = 0.6) and appropriateness and safety of Mx (p = 0.1 and 1.0, respectively). PCPs outperformed AMIE in the practicality (p = 0.003) and cost effectiveness (p = 0.004) of Mx. While further research is needed, this study demonstrates the initial feasibility, safety, and user acceptance of conversational AI in a real-world setting, representing crucial steps towards clinical translation. View details
A large language model for complex cardiology care
Jack W O’Sullivan
Khaled Saab
Daniel K. Amponsah
Evaline Cheng
Yong Cheng
Emily Chu
Yaanik Desai
Aly Elezaby
Muhammad Fazal
Tasmeen Hussain
Sneha S. Jain
Daniel Seung Kim
Roy Lan
Jiwen Li
Wilson Tang
Natalie Tapaskar
Victoria Parikh
Ryan Sandoval
Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla
Bryan Wu
Kavita Kulkarni
Philip Mansfield
Juro Gottweis
Joelle Barral
Ryutaro Tanno
Sara Mahdavi
Euan Ashley
Nature Medicine (2026)
Preview abstract The scarcity of subspecialist medical expertise poses a considerable challenge for healthcare delivery. This issue is particularly acute in cardiology, where timely, accurate management determines outcomes. We explored the potential of Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE), a large language model-based experimental medical artificial intelligence system, to augment clinical decision-making in this challenging context. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing large language model-assisted care with the usual care of complex patients suspected of having a genetic cardiomyopathy, and we curated a real-world dataset of complex cases from a subspecialist cardiology practice. Nine participating general cardiologists were provided with access to both clinical text reports and raw diagnostic data—including electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scans and cardiopulmonary exercise testing—and were randomized to manage these cases, either with or without assistance from AMIE. We developed a ten-domain evaluation rubric used by three blinded subspecialists to evaluate the quality of triage, diagnosis and management. In our randomized controlled trial with retrospective patient data, subspecialists favored large language model-assisted responses overall, and for the management plan and diagnostic testing domains, with the remaining domains considered a tie. Overall, subspecialists preferred AMIE-assisted cardiology assessments 46.7% of the time, compared with 32.7% for cardiologists alone (P = 0.02), with 20.6% rated as a tie. Subspecialists also quantified errors, extra and missing content, reasoning and potential bias. Cardiologists alone had more clinically significant errors (24.3% versus 13.1%, P = 0.033) and more missing content (37.4% versus 17.8%, P = 0.0021) than cardiologists assisted by AMIE. Lastly, cardiologists who used AMIE reported that AMIE helped their assessment more than half the time (57.0%) and saved time in 50.5% of cases. View details
Preview abstract Although large language models have shown promise in diagnostic dialogue, their capabilities for effective management reasoning, including disease progression, therapeutic response and safe medication prescription, have remained underexplored. We have advanced the previously demonstrated diagnostic capabilities of the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE) using a new large-language-model-based agentic system optimized for multivisit clinical management and dialogue. To ground the reasoning of AMIE in authoritative clinical knowledge, we leveraged the long-context capabilities of Gemini, combining in-context retrieval with structured reasoning to align its output with up-to-date clinical practice guidelines and drug formularies. In a randomized, blinded virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination study, AMIE was compared to 21 primary care physicians (PCPs) across 100 multivisit case scenarios designed to reflect the guidance of the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and BMJ Best Practice guidelines. AMIE was non-inferior to PCPs in management reasoning, as assessed by specialists, and scored better both with respect to preciseness of treatment and investigation, and in terms of its alignment with and grounding in clinical guidelines. To benchmark medication reasoning, we developed RxQA, a multiple-choice question benchmark that was derived from two national drug formularies (from the USA and UK) and validated by board-certified pharmacists. Although AMIE and PCPs both benefited from the ability to access external drug information, AMIE outperformed PCPs on higher-difficulty questions. Although further research will be needed before real-world translation of AMIE, its strong performance across evaluations marks a significant step towards use of conversational artificial intelligence as a tool in disease management. View details
CoDaS: AI Co-Data-Scientist for Biomarker Discovery via Wearable Sensors
Juro Gottweis
CJ Park
Salman Rahman
Ahmed Metwally
Hong Yu
Ivor Rendulic
Yuzhe Yang
Petar Sirkovic
Daniel McDuff
Shwetak Patel
Nicolas Stroppa
Yubin Kim
Mark Malhotra
Orson Xu
Sam Schmidgall
Tim Althoff
Elahe Vedadi
Cynthia Breazeal
Hae Won Park
(2026)
Preview abstract Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), have demonstrated significant potential in clinical reasoning skills such as history-taking and differential diagnosis generation—critical aspects of medical education. This work explores how LLMs can augment medical curricula through interactive learning. We conducted a participatory design process with medical students, residents and medical education experts to co-create an AI-powered tutor prototype for clinical reasoning. As part of the co-design process, we conducted a qualitative user study, investigating learning needs and practices via interviews, and conducting concept evaluations through interactions with the prototype. Findings highlight the challenges learners face in transitioning from theoretical knowledge to practical application, and how an AI tutor can provide personalized practice and feedback. We conclude with design considerations, emphasizing the importance of context-specific knowledge and emulating positive preceptor traits, to guide the development of AI tools for medical education. View details
Towards accurate differential diagnosis with large language models
Daniel McDuff
Amy Wang
Karan Singhal
Yash Sharma
Kavita Kulkarni
Le Hou
Yong Cheng
Sara Mahdavi
Sushant Prakash
Anupam Pathak
Shwetak Patel
Ewa Dominowska
Juro Gottweis
Joelle Barral
Kat Chou
Jake Sunshine
Nature (2025)
Preview abstract A comprehensive differential diagnosis is a cornerstone of medical care that is often reached through an iterative process of interpretation that combines clinical history, physical examination, investigations and procedures. Interactive interfaces powered by large language models present new opportunities to assist and automate aspects of this process. Here we introduce the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE), a large language model that is optimized for diagnostic reasoning, and evaluate its ability to generate a differential diagnosis alone or as an aid to clinicians. Twenty clinicians evaluated 302 challenging, real-world medical cases sourced from published case reports. Each case report was read by two clinicians, who were randomized to one of two assistive conditions: assistance from search engines and standard medical resources; or assistance from AMIE in addition to these tools. All clinicians provided a baseline, unassisted differential diagnosis prior to using the respective assistive tools. AMIE exhibited standalone performance that exceeded that of unassisted clinicians (top-10 accuracy 59.1% versus 33.6%, P = 0.04). Comparing the two assisted study arms, the differential diagnosis quality score was higher for clinicians assisted by AMIE (top-10 accuracy 51.7%) compared with clinicians without its assistance (36.1%; McNemar’s test: 45.7, P < 0.01) and clinicians with search (44.4%; McNemar’s test: 4.75, P = 0.03). Further, clinicians assisted by AMIE arrived at more comprehensive differential lists than those without assistance from AMIE. Our study suggests that AMIE has potential to improve clinicians’ diagnostic reasoning and accuracy in challenging cases, meriting further real-world evaluation for its ability to empower physicians and widen patients’ access to specialist-level expertise. View details
Preview abstract Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in medical question answering, with Med-PaLM being the first to exceed a ‘passing’ score in United States Medical Licensing Examination style questions. However, challenges remain in long-form medical question answering and handling real-world workflows. Here, we present Med-PaLM 2, which bridges these gaps with a combination of base LLM improvements, medical domain fine-tuning and new strategies for improving reasoning and grounding through ensemble refinement and chain of retrieval. Med-PaLM 2 scores up to 86.5% on the MedQA dataset, improving upon Med-PaLM by over 19%, and demonstrates dramatic performance increases across MedMCQA, PubMedQA and MMLU clinical topics datasets. Our detailed human evaluations framework shows that physicians prefer Med-PaLM 2 answers to those from other physicians on eight of nine clinical axes. Med-PaLM 2 also demonstrates significant improvements over its predecessor across all evaluation metrics, particularly on new adversarial datasets designed to probe LLM limitations (P < 0.001). In a pilot study using real-world medical questions, specialists preferred Med-PaLM 2 answers to generalist physician answers 65% of the time. While specialist answers were still preferred overall, both specialists and generalists rated Med-PaLM 2 to be as safe as physician answers, demonstrating its growing potential in real-world medical applications. View details
Towards conversational diagnostic artificial intelligence
Khaled Saab
Jan Freyberg
Ryutaro Tanno
Amy Wang
Brenna Li
Nenad Tomašev
Karan Singhal
Yong Cheng
Le Hou
Albert Webson
Kavita Kulkarni
Sara Mahdavi
Juro Gottweis
Joelle Barral
Kat Chou
Nature (2025)
Preview abstract At the heart of medicine lies physician–patient dialogue, where skillful history-taking enables effective diagnosis, management and enduring trust. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems capable of diagnostic dialogue could increase accessibility and quality of care. However, approximating clinicians’ expertise is an outstanding challenge. Here we introduce AMIE (Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer), a large language model (LLM)-based AI system optimized for diagnostic dialogue. AMIE uses a self-play-based simulated environment with automated feedback for scaling learning across disease conditions, specialties and contexts. We designed a framework for evaluating clinically meaningful axes of performance, including history-taking, diagnostic accuracy, management, communication skills and empathy. We compared AMIE’s performance to that of primary care physicians in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of text-based consultations with validated patient-actors similar to objective structured clinical examination. The study included 159 case scenarios from providers in Canada, the United Kingdom and India, 20 primary care physicians compared to AMIE, and evaluations by specialist physicians and patient-actors. AMIE demonstrated greater diagnostic accuracy and superior performance on 30 out of 32 axes according to the specialist physicians and 25 out of 26 axes according to the patient-actors. Our research has several limitations and should be interpreted with caution. Clinicians used synchronous text chat, which permits large-scale LLM–patient interactions, but this is unfamiliar in clinical practice. While further research is required before AMIE could be translated to real-world settings, the results represent a milestone towards conversational diagnostic AI. View details
Exploring large language models for specialist-level oncology care
Vikram Dhillon
Polly Niravath
Preethi Prasad
Khaled Saab
Ryutaro Tanno
Yong Cheng
Hanh Mai
Ethan Burns
Zainub Ajmal
Kavita Kulkarni
Philip Mansfield
Joelle Barral
Juro Gottweis
Sara Mahdavi
NEJM AI (2025)
Preview abstract Large language models have shown rapid progress in encoding clinical knowledge and demonstrating clinical reasoning. However, their capabilities in subspecialty or complex medical settings remain underexplored. In this work, we probe the performance of Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE), a conversational diagnostic AI system in the subspecialty of breast oncology care without specific fine-tuning to this challenging domain. To perform this evaluation, we curated a set of 60 synthetic breast cancer vignettes representing a range of treatment-naive, treatment-refractory, and rare histology cases encountered in a community-based breast oncology clinic. We developed a detailed clinical rubric for evaluating management plans, including axes such as the quality of case summarization, safety of the proposed care plan, and recommendations for treatment (i.e., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and hormonal therapy). To improve performance, we enhanced AMIE with the inference-time ability to perform web search retrieval to gather relevant and up-to-date clinical knowledge and refine its responses with a multistage, self-critique pipeline. We compare the response quality of AMIE with that of internal medicine trainees, oncology fellows, and general oncology attendings under both automated and specialist clinician evaluations. Although our evaluations were limited to a few physicians, AMIE outperformed trainees and fellows, demonstrating the potential of the system in this important domain. However, AMIE’s performance was overall inferior to that of attending oncologists, suggesting that further prospective research is needed. View details
Preview abstract Note this is a re-submission of a previously approved ITP. The previous approval was conditional for a journal pre-sub enquiry only and we are submitting a new ITP for the preprint of the paper. AI models have been proposed for hypothesis generation, but testing their ability to drive high-impact research is challenging, since an AI-generated hypothesis can take decades to validate. Here, we challenge the ability of a recently developed LLM-based platform to generate high-level hypotheses by posing a question that took years to resolve experimentally but remained unpublished: How could capsid-forming phage-inducible chromosomal islands (cf-PICIs) spread across bacterial species? Remarkably, the AI’s top- ranked hypothesis matched our experimentally confirmed mechanism: cf-PICIs hijack diverse phage tails to expand their host range. We critically assess the AI’s five highest- ranked hypotheses, showing that some opened new research avenues in our laboratories. We benchmark its performance against other LLMs and outline best practices for integrating AI into scientific discovery. Our findings suggest that AI can act not just as a computational tool, but as a creative engine, accelerating discovery and reshaping how we generate and test scientific hypotheses. View details
×